-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the effect of amniotic membrane and collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration in dental implant surgery
-
Design
-
Clinical trial with control group, with parallel groups, double-blind, randomized, simple randomization using random number table and randomization.com site and opaque sealed envelope with random sequence
-
Settings and conduct
-
The study was performed at the implant section of Mashhad Dental School clinic.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups and implant treatment was performed. After 3-4 months, the implant stability was assessed by a researcher unaware of the used membrane.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Patients referred to the implant department of the Mashhad dental school clinic; implant candidate; having a 3-wall intrabony defect.
Non-inclusion criteria: Individuals with systemic disease; presence of local factors that prevent natural healing
-
Intervention groups
-
Control group (Membrane collagen group): The bone defect was filled with bone graft (Cerabone, GmbH, Germany) before placing the implant (Biohorizons, BioHorizons IPH ) and then covered with collagen membrane with a size of 2cm.1/5cm (Jason membrane, bottis, Germany).
Intervention group (Membrane amniotic group): The bone defect was filled with bone graft (Cerabone, GmbH, Germany) before placing the implant (Biohorizons, BioHorizons IPH ), but then it was covered by amniotic membrane (AmniPatch, TRC, Iran).
-
Main outcome variables
-
Implant osteointegration; Implant success rate