-
Study aim
-
Determining the comparison between the two methods of saphenous nerve block and nerve block in the proximal adductor canal with high volume in knee surgeries to control of acute pain
-
Design
-
A double-blind controlled two-group trial after surgery in recovery if each patient has the characteristics of random entry using the last digit of the patient file number, even numbers in one group and odd numbers in the other group. Each group is 25 , total 50
-
Settings and conduct
-
Both groups take general anesthesia saphenous nerve block with sonoguided, with 0.2% ropivacaine drug with a volume of 15 cc in the middle of the thigh. the second Proximal adductor canal block of the lower third of the thigh with a sonoguide is performed with the drug ropivacaine 0.1% with a volume of 30 cc in one year in Firozgar hospital
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Entry, All patients between 30 and 70 years old with ASA one and two undergoing Anterior cruciate ligament surgery and total knee joint replacement, tibial plateau surgery and tibial osteotomy ,Non-entry, no pain during recovery, duration of operation more than three hours, addiction to drugs, any use of painkillers within 48 hours before the operation and history of previous surgery on the same knee
-
Intervention groups
-
Nerve block or regional nerve block is any intentional interruption in the movement of the nerve message along the nerve, which is usually done in order to reduce pain, In this study these blocks are used to apply anesthesia in therapeutic interventions involving the distal thigh and femur, the knee, and the medial part of the leg.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Acute pain control based on NRS, restlessness based on Ramsay sedation score