-
Study aim
-
Safety and efficacy evaluation of Varasurf compared with Curosurf in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome
-
Design
-
A double-arm, double-blind, active-controlled, randomized phase I/III clinical trial in preterm neonates
-
Settings and conduct
-
In the Phase I, after obtaining informed consent from parents or legal guardians and if the neonates were eligible to enroll the study, 5 or 15 premature neonates (based on the DSMB will receive Varasurf.
7 days after the enrollment of the last neonate, the study report will be presented to DSMB members. In case of DSMB committee approval, the phase III study will be initiated randomized, double-blind, double-arm, parallel, active control, non-inferiority in terms of safety and efficacy compared to Curosurf. In the Phase III , if informed consent is obtained, infants who were admitted due to RDS in the NICU of Akbarabadi Hospitals in Tehran, Omolbanin Hospital in Mashhad, and Aliebneabitaleb Hospital in Zahedan, if they are eligible to study enrollment, they will receive a random code. In Phase III, 104 premature neonates (52 neonates in each arm) will receive Varasurf or Curosurf surfactant in a random ratio (1:1).
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Premature neonates with RDS with a gestational age of 28 to 34 weeks and a weight of 1000 to 2500 kg born in the study hospital and have an indication for receiving surfactant who do not have any other diseases.
-
Intervention groups
-
The intervention group received Varasurf and the control group received Curosurf intratracheally (through a endotracheal tube).
-
Main outcome variables
-
The efficacy outcomes including changes in MAP, SpO2, FIO2, and the duration of mechanical ventilation. Safety outcomes including adverse events, death, pulmonary hemorrhage, sepsis, pneumothorax, IVH and BPD