-
Study aim
-
The present study is designed to compare of the effect of neurodynamic mobilization and dry needling technique on the pain, function, and ankle range of motion in subjects with patients with lumbar herniated disc.
-
Design
-
A clinical trial with a control group, double-blind, randomized, is performed on 80 patients. Block randomization is used for randomization.
-
Settings and conduct
-
Patients with lumbar herniated disc are assigned to four groups of control, DN, neurodynamic, and a combination of these two techniques according to block randomization. The two-blind study will be conducted in such a way that people are assigned to groups and patients are evaluated by people who are unaware.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Patients aged 21-50 years who have been diagnosed with a disc lesion by MRI and a specialist physician. They also have pain, numbness, and tingling in the sciatic nerve path for at least 12 weeks to 1 year. In addition, they have a positive Slump and SLR test with neurological symptoms, are included in the study. Patients with lumbar canal stenosis or piriformis syndrome, any spinal surgery and any systemic disease and/or history of vertebral fracture or trauma were excluded from the study.
-
Intervention groups
-
Dry needling (DN): It is used on the trigger point in the lumbar, gluteal, thigh and leg muscles. The needle is applied for three sessions with an interval of one day. Neurodynamic technique: The technique of neurodynamic mobilization of the sciatic nerve is performed in two tension and slide modes three sessions a week for 2 weeks. Control group: After the involved points are determined, the therapist applied soft and superficial massage on the involved muscles.
-
Main outcome variables
-
1. Pain intensity 2. Disability index 3.Ankle range of motion